Did the Navy steal the design for one of its new Littoral Combat Ships?
Did the Navy steal the design for one of its new Coastal Combat Ships?
The Navy's Littoral Combat Ship has had a troubled pattern and deployment history. Evolution on the LCS began after the Cold State of war had concluded and was intended to deliver a new, relatively small vessel capable of operating close to shore (hence the word "littoral"). Over time, the goals for the program expanded, until the LCS was expected to field advanced modules that could be swapped out in a matter of hours and immune the ship to perform a variety of tasks. In theory, the LCS can tackle anti-submarine warfare, minesweeping, surface warfare, and special warfare missions, provided the proper hardware is installed first. Price overruns, metallurgical problems, and technological difficulties have all plagued the LCS classes, and an ongoing lawsuit alleges that i of the 2 classes of Littoral Combat Ship currently in service violated critical patents awarded to a ship designer several decades agone.
One betoken of clarification earlier we dive in. The allegations we'll discuss apply merely to the Freedom-class LCS, which uses a monoplaning hull blueprint. The trimaran-hulled Independence-class LCS is non implicated in the case. The Daily Beast has done an all-encompassing study on this result and the accusations against the Navy brought past one David Giles, a shipbuilder with decades in the business. In 1992 and 1993, Giles (who owns the company Fastship) was awarded patents on a monohull design that combines semi-planed ship hulls (hulls with a flattened underside) with waterjets that burn h2o across that apartment plane while the ship is underway. The specific ships Fastship envisioned in its patent applications were vessels longer than 200 feet with a deportation in excess of ii,000 tons. Giles' original goal was to build cargo ships that could striking 38 knots or more, compared to the 23 knots standard cargo vessels average. Fastship was incorporated in 1997 just had trouble finding buyers for its engineering due to the high cost of prototypes and, later, the Swell Recession.
Enter Lockheed-Martin, which did substantial work on the Navy's LCS vessels. Fastship formed a strategic partnership with Lockheed and handed over its design specs and test data from prototypes the visitor congenital itself. Fastship has also testified in court that it shared this data with the Navy under confidential agreements from 1998 – 2000. The original design that Fastship had contemplated was significantly larger than the Navy's 2003 proposal for an LCS — Fastship's sweet spot for its technology was a vessel roughly 300 feet long with a maximum speed of 40 – fifty knots and a 2,450-ton displacement.
But as the Navy's LCS concept evolved, the ship became much larger. The USS Freedom is 378 feet long, displaces 3,500 metric tons, and has a maximum speed of 47 knots, which puts information technology much closer to the type of ship Giles envisioned, equally opposed to the far smaller vessel the Navy originally contemplated. Lockheed dropped its partnership with Giles in 2004, Giles starting time wrote to the Navy well-nigh its violation of his patents in 2008, only the Navy rejected his claims. The current lawsuit was filed in 2022 after the Navy rejected Giles' claims of administrative infringement. Both sides accept lined upward expert witnesses to argue whether Giles' patents were or were non obvious (this is common in patent suits) as well as whether or non the current Independence-class blueprint really violates the patents themselves. Giles recently upped the dues with testimony from Richard Garwin, a physicist who worked on the development of early spy satellites, contributed to early work on spin-echo magnetic resonance (which laid the foundations for the development of the MRI),helped discover algorithms disquisitional to digital signal processing, and helped develop both laser printers and touchscreen displays. If that's non enough, he's also widely known equally the writer of the kickoff hydrogen bomb design (Mike, tested in 1952).
Garwin has argued that the improvements made to ship performance by adding water jets were non-obvious to other shipbuilders, and that the government's other skillful witnesses fabricated a number of errors in their attempts to disprove the importance of Giles' patents. So far, the trial judge has limited the lawsuit to the single LCS send congenital before Giles' patents expired in 2022, the USS Freedom, simply won't rule on whether or not the Freedom infringed on Giles' intellectual property until early on 2022.
Source: https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/240454-navy-steal-design-one-new-littoral-combat-ships
Posted by: wallingwitheave1948.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Did the Navy steal the design for one of its new Littoral Combat Ships?"
Post a Comment